Gravity data captured by satellite has allowed researchers to take a closer look at the geology deep beneath the Tibetan Plateau.
The analysis, published in the journal Nature Scientific Reports, offers some of the clearest views ever obtained of rock moving up to 50 miles below the plateau, in the lowest layer of Earth’s crust.
There, the Indian tectonic plate presses continually northward into the Eurasian tectonic plate, giving rise to the highest mountains on Earth — and deadly earthquakes, such as the one that killed more than 9,000 people in Nepal earlier this year.
The study supports what researchers have long suspected: Horizontal compression between the two continental plates is the dominant driver of geophysical processes in the region, said C.K. Shum, professor and Distinguished University Scholar in the Division of Geodetic Science, School of Earth Sciences at The Ohio State University and a co-author of the study.
“The new gravity data onboard the joint NASA-German Aerospace Center GRACE gravimeter mission and the European Space Agency’s GOCE gravity gradiometer mission enabled scientists to build global gravity field models with unprecedented accuracy and resolution, which improved our understanding of the crustal structure,” Shum said. “Specifically, we’re now able to better quantify the thickening and buckling of the crust beneath the Tibetan Plateau.”
Shum is part of an international research team led by Younghong Shin of the Korea Institute of Geosciences and Mineral Resource. With other researchers in Korea, Italy and China, they are working together to conduct geophysical interpretations of the Tibetan Plateau geodynamics using the latest combined gravity measurements by the GOCE gravity gradiometer and the GRACE gravimeter missions.
Satellites such as GRACE and GOCE measure small changes in the force of gravity around the planet. Gravity varies slightly from place to place in part because of an uneven distribution of rock in Earth’s interior.
The resulting computer model offers a 3-D reconstruction of what’s happening deep within earth.
As the two continental plates press together horizontally, the crust piles up. Like traffic backing up on a congested freeway system, the rock follows whatever side roads may be available to relieve the pressure.
But unlike cars on a freeway, the rock beneath Tibet has two additional options for escape. It can push upward to form the Himalayan mountain chain, or downward to form the base of the Tibetan Plateau.
The process takes millions of years, but caught in the 3-D image of the computer model, the up-and-down and side-to-side motions create a complex interplay of wavy patterns at the boundary between the crust and the mantle, known to researchers as the Mohorovičić discontinuity, or “Moho.”
“What’s particularly useful about the new gravity model is that it reveals the Moho topography is not random, but rather has a semi-regular pattern of ranges and folds, and agrees with the ongoing tectonic collision and current crustal movement measured by GPS,” Shin said.
As such, the researchers hope that the model will provide new insights into the analysis of collisional boundaries around the world.
Co-author Carla Braitenberg of the University of Trieste said that the study has already helped explain one curious aspect of the region’s geology: the sideways motion of the Tibetan Plateau. While India is pushing the plateau northward, GPS measurements show that portions of the crust are flowing eastward and even turning to the southeast.
“The GOCE data show that the movement recorded at the surface has a deep counterpart at the base of the crust,” Braitenberg said. Connecting the rock flow below to movement above will help researchers better understand the forces at work in the region.
Those same forces led to the deadly Nepal earthquake in April 2015. But Shum said that the new model almost certainly won’t help with earthquake forecasting — at least not in the near future.
“I would say that we would understand the mechanism more if we had more measurements,” he said, but such capabilities “would be very far away.”
Even in California — where, Shum pointed out, different tectonic processes are at work than in Tibet — researchers are unable to forecast earthquakes, despite having abundant GPS, seismic and gravity data. Even less is known about Tibet, in part because the rough terrain makes installing GPS equipment difficult.
Other co-authors on the study included Sang Mook Lee of Seoul National University; Sung-Ho Na of the University of Science and Technology in Daejeon, Korea; Kwang Sun Choi of Pusan National University; Houtse Hsu of the Institute of Geodesy & Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences; and Young-Sue Park and Mutaek Lim of the Korea Institute of Geosciences and Mineral Resource.
This research was supported by the Basic Research Project of the Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning of Korea. Shum was partially supported by NASA’s GRACE Science Team Program and Concept in Advanced Geodesy Program. Braitenberg was partially supported by the European Space Agency’s Center for Earth Observation as part of the GOCE User ToolBox project.
Reference:
Young Hong Shin, C.K. Shum, Carla Braitenberg, Sang Mook Lee, Sung -Ho Na, Kwang Sun Choi, Houtse Hsu, Young-Sue Park, Mutaek Lim. Moho topography, ranges and folds of Tibet by analysis of global gravity models and GOCE data. Scientific Reports, 2015; 5: 11681 DOI: 10.1038/srep11681
Note: The above post is reprinted from materials provided by Ohio State University. The original item was written by Pam Frost Gorder.
